1 2025:CGHC:26981 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5026 of 2025 1 - Basant Kumar Pal S/o Late Shri Nityanand Aged About 58 Years (Head Master) Grade-2, R/o P.W.D., Ward And Tahsil Gedam, District- Dantewada (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Cum Director Of District Mission District Project Office, Samagra Shiksha, District Dantewada (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer District Project Office, Samagra Shiksha, District Dantewada (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer Block Office Gedam, Dantewada (C.G.) 5 - Shri Jitendra Chauhan Aged About 44 Years Teacher (Lb) Block Resource Coordinator (Brc), Gedam, District Dantewada (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. G.A. for Res. No. 1 & 4 Ms. Akanksha Jain, Advocate for Res. No. 2 & 3 SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.06.24 10:06:56 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 23/06/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the following relief:- 10.1 That, the respondents may kindly be directed to submit the entire records as regards the petitioner’s case. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside and quash the Order No. / 1988/ Smagra Shiksha/ B.R.C./ 2023- 24 dated 06.03.2024 (Annexure-P/1). Further, may kindly be direct the respondents to consider his pending representation dated 20.06.2024, 24.07.2024 and 11.04.2025 (Annexure-P/3), in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to pass any order or issue any suitable writ or direction as may deem fit under the circumstances of the case including cost of the petition. The respondents may kindly be directed to give priority in appointment to the post. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his submissions to the extent that the Respondent No. 2 Collector cum Director of District Mission, may be directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure-P/3) within the reasonable period. He would further submit that the petitioner is appointed as Cluster Coordinator vide order dated 07.02.2022 and was posted at Cluster Centre at Haram, Dist- South Bastar, whereas vide order dated 06.03.2024, the Respondent No. 5 Jitendra Chouhan has also been posted at Block Resources Cluster Coordinator and his place of posting is also Block Resources Cluster Centre Geedam and therefore, there is clash of 3 posting of both these parties on the same place for which he moved his representation on 24.07.2024 to the Respondent No. 2 & 3, but the same has not been decided till date. Therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel as well as counsel for the respondent No. 2 & 3 would submit that they have no objection if such a direction is being given to the authorities concerned to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within a reasonable time. 4. On due consideration, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 Collector cum Director of District Mission, District Project Office, Samagra Shiksha, Dist- Dantewada is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 20.06.2024 and 24.07.2024 (Annexure-P/3) within 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in accordance with law on its own merits. 5. The petitioner is directed to produce the copy of this order within two weeks to the Respondent No. 2. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika