Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26123 (CHH)

ABHISHEK SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1124/2022 · 2025-07-29

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37212 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1124 of 2022 Abhishek Shrivastava S/o Amitabh Shrivastava, Aged About 37 Years R/o I-5/ 45, Sector -16, Rohini Thana, K.N. Karaju Marg, New Delhi. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Sarkanda Thana, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Surendra Kumar -Notary Officer, Government Of India, Sr-Vi, Pitampura, New Delhi. 3. Shilpi Shrivastava W/o Varun Gopal, Aged About 34 Years R/o Om Nivas, Behind Manorama Dairy, Zorapara, Thana Sarkand, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Varun Gopal (Absconding) S/o Manmohan Gopal, Aged About 35 Years R/o Yz 294/09, G-Block, Hari Nagar, Jail Road, Ps -Hari Nagar, New Delhi. ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Tanmay Thomas, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Himanshu Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.30 18:20:27 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR dated 28.04.2017 and also the charge-sheet (final report) under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. dated 03.12.2019 bearing No. 825 of 2019 (Annexure P/1 Colly.), in the ends of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the present CRMP has been filed seeking quashing of the FIR, charge-sheet, and the entire criminal proceedings, charges have already been framed by the learned trial Court against the petitioner. Accordingly, he prays for permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the same at an appropriate stage. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan