1 2025:CGHC:30025 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1269 of 2019 1 - Smt. Vimla Verma W/o Meghnath Verma Aged About 42 Years R/o Village And Post Devsundara, Police Station Palari, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1 - Sheru Sahu S/o Ramkhilawan Sahu R/o Village And Post Devsundara, Police Station Palari, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of Vehicle No. C.G. -04-H Q - 0187), District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kishanlal Sahu S/o Ramkhilawan Sahu R/o Village And Post Devsundara, Police Station Palari, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Vehicle No. C.G. -04-H Q - 0187), District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - United India Insurance Company Pvt. Limited Through Divisional Manager (Zonal No. 1) United India Insurer Company Limited Raipur Chhattisgarh.(Insurer Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04-H Q - 0187), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate For Respondents No. 3 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate along with Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate and Ms. Shrishti Upadhyay, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 02/07/2025 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal in its SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 award dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Ninth Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.) in Claim Case No. 682/2015. 2. Learned counsels for the Respondent No. 3 pointed out that the appellant has preferred two appeals. The another appeal is also listed today bearing MAC No. 1049/2018. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant after verifying the said fact submits that in view of the objection raised by the counsels for the Respondent No. 3 and further, counsel for the appellant in another appeal is also counsel for the claimant, in the appeal filed by the insurance company bearing MAC No. 610/2018 and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record of the claim case. 5. Considering the submission of counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey