APHC010370272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24659/2020 Between: MR SHAIK MAQBOOL JANI, S/O LATE SHAIK SALAR AGE. 67, R/O.16-225-OPERATION COLONY, NEAR POLAMAMBA GUDI,VISAKHAPATNAM, AP.-530040. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, , MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522502 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER P S, TUNI- URBAN, E.G. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533401 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S, TUNI- RURAL E.G. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -533401 5. MR G NAGESAWARA RAO, LEASE FARMER, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, R/O. 2-63, RAPAKA VILLAGE, K MALLAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH -533401 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANGURU NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent police in continuing to adjudicate the civil nature of dispute between the petitioner and the 5th Respondent despite the final payment of Rs. 2 25,50,000/- ( Rupees twenty five lacks fifty thousand only) made by the petitioner at the instance of the Respondent Police as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional violative of articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India, consequently restrain the Respondent Police from harassing the petitioner and family members as similarly held in W.P.No.1367 of 2009 Dt. 18.8.2009 by the Honourable High Court at Hyderabad.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. 3. Sri Anguru Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24659 of 2020 Dt.28.08.2025 Dinesh