Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26115 (CHH)

SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1811/2025 · 2025-06-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23843 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1811 of 2025 1 - Surendra Singh S/o Laxman Singh Aged About 31 Years R/o House No.-332, Village - Katra, P.S. - Patan, District - Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 2 - Mahesh Singh S/o Sahab Singh Aged About 18 Years R/o House No.- 332, Village - Katra, P.S. - Patan, District - Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, P.S. - Singhoda, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 13.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 10.05.2024 passed in MCRC No. 1454 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicants, namely, Surendra Singh and Mahesh Singh, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on one occasion also, this Court had grated extension of time for compliance of the order dated 10.05.2024. 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Saraipali District- Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 16.05.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in this case, after the evidence of 15 prosecution witnesses has been recorded, the statement of the accused, final arguments and defence evidence are yet to be taken, due to which the case could not be concluded within the time prescribed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal