Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010369922025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19216/2025 Between:
1. AKURATHI RAMESH,, S/O A. GANESWARA RAO (LATE), AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D/NO.9-7/2, SALIPETA, AKIVEEDU VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIAPI SECRETDTY,
REVENUE DEPARTEMENT, SECRETRAIT BUILDINGS, NELAPADU, GUNTUR AMARAVATHI.
2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTICT.
4. THE THASILDHAR, AKIVEEDU VILLAGE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 2 to 4 in rejecting the representation dt. 9/6/2025 as highly arbitrary and illegal in addition against the provisions of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Act, 201 Sand also
SRS,J W.P.No.19216 of 2025
violation of Art. 300A of constitution of India and consequentially set aside the
order dt. 7/7/2025 of the 3rd respondent and direct the respondents 2 and 3 to refer the representation of the petitioner to the apropriate authority U/s 64 of right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Act, 2013, forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the order dt. 7/7/2025 of the Respondent No. 3 pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T M K CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
Assailing the endorsement issued by respondent No.3 vide Roc.No.1152/2025/DT, dated 07.07.2025 (Ex.P1), the above writ petition has been filed.
2. Heard Sri T.M.K. Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for respondents 1 to 4.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner’s land of an extent of Ac.0.37 cents in R.S.No.553 of Akiveedu Village was acquired. The competent authority determined the compensation of Rs.14,46,128/-.
Learned counsel would also submit that the petitioner made a representation
SRS,J W.P.No.19216 of 2025
dated 09.06.2025 (Ex.P3) to the competent authority – respondent No.3. Without considering the explanation, respondent No.3 issued an endorsement impugned in the writ petition.
4. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will avail of the appropriate remedy as prescribed under Section 3G (5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail of the remedy as prescribed by the Act. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 29.07.2025 TVN
SRS,J W.P.No.19216 of 2025
7 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.19216 OF 2025
Date : 29.07.2025 TVN