1 2025:CGHC:23955 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4282 of 2025 1 - Smt. Priti Gupta W/o. Janmesh Gupta Aged About 33 Years Lecturer (Physics), At Swami Karpatri Ji Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kawardha, Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Public Instructions, Directorate Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, Kabirdham Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Kabirdham, Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 13/06/2025 1. The present petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 by which the petitioner herein has been transferred from VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.06.13 19:52:07 +0530 2 Swami Karpatri Ji Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kawardha, District Kabirdham to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Birkona, District Kabirdham. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order is not in accordance with rationalization instruction issued on 02.08.2024, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He would further submits that clause 4 of the said instruction dated 02.08.2024 has not been complied with as the probation period of the petitioner is not completed and she is still on probation and no formal order of her regulaization has been passed yet. The Clause 6 of the instruction dated 02.08.2024 had not been followed and she has been transferred under the instruction of rationalization. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that if the petitioner files a fresh representation, then the same will be considered decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of 7 days. 4. I have learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 19th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner within 07 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law, in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the petitioner, the impugned transfer order issued under Teacher 3 Rationalization Instructions, so far as petitioner is concerned, be kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved