M/S SRI RANGANATH ELECTRICALS v. THE MANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY
WP/11953/2020 · 2025-01-22
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26106 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2709 WP No. 11953 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 11953 OF 2020 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
M/S. SRI RANGANATH ELECTRICALS, AT NO.546 2 B MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-560 072.
REPRESENTED BY SRI VINAYAK PATIL, S/O LATE KRISHNA RAO PATIL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.546, 2B MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-560 072.
PROJECT MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, M/S. SRI RANGANATH ELECTRICALS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVI.H.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY A GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT MESCOM BHAVANA, BEJAI, MANGALURU-575 004.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2709 WP No. 11953 of 2020
2.
THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ELE. (PROC), MESCOM, MANGALURU-575 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. DEEPIKA., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. D.J.RAKSHITHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Prasanna Kumar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ravi.H.K., for the petitioner and Smt.Deepika., counsel on behalf of Smt.D.J.Rakshitha., for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Prasanna Kumar., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2709 WP No. 11953 of 2020
The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 40