IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. No.15292 of 2025 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 Neelam Rana …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ..Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Baldev Negi, Additional Advocate General. 4._ _______________________________________ Satyen Vaidya , Judge (oral) Notice. Mr. Baldev Negi, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed with a limited prayer to direct the competent authority i.e respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner Annexures P-4 and P-5 in time bound manner. 3. The petitioner is stated to have served sub cadre area since 22.06.2022 as she has served as language teacher with GSSS Lapas, Tehsil Padhar, District Mandi, H.P. Therefore, the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2( 2025:HHC:33029 ) petitioner having become entitled for being posted at station at her choice has submitted the aforesaid representations. It is revealed that the representation was submitted on 17.06.2025 and its reminder was submitted 10.09.2025. The Transfer Policy adopted by the State Government allows the incumbent to seek his/her transfer to a place of choice after serving certain categories of areas which includes sub cadre area also. Thus, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide representation of the petitioner Annexure P-4 within three weeks from today and the petitioner shall be intimated with the decision so taken. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge September 22,2025 (veena)