APHC010369152020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24558/2020 Between: VANKADARA CHINNA CHENNAPPA, S/O. V.YESSANNA,AGED 37 YRS, OCC.- AGRICULTURE, R/O. 277, KOLIMIGUNDLA, KOLIMIGUNDLA, KURNOOL (D), ANDHRA PRADESH - 518 123 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AMARAVATHI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLIMIGUNDLA POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 6. PERAM SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. NARSIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YRS, OCC. RETIRED V.R.O., ITIKYALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 7. KAMINI THIMMA REDDY, S/O. MADILETI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YRS, OCC. POLITICAL LEADER, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 8. ERUKALIMALLAIAH, S/O. PEDDANAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YRS, OCC. MEDIATOR/BROKER, R/O. KOLIMIGUNDLA VILLAGE MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 9. T V RAMUDU, S/O. BALISETTY, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, OCC. POLITICAL LEADER, R/O. KOLIMIGUNDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 10. VANKADHARA RAVI KUMAR, S/O. YESANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KOLIMIGUNDLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 11. VANKADHARAPEDDAACHARI, S/O. PRABHUDASU, AGED ABOUT 39 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 2 12. VANKADHARACHINNAACHARI, S/O. PRABHUDASU, AGED ABOUT 42 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 13. VANKADHARA VENKATA RAMANAIAH, S/O. PEDDAACHARI, AGED ABOUT 24 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 14. VANKADHARAVIJAYUDU, S/O. YESANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 15. VANKADHARA PRABHAKAR, S/O. YESANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 16. GUTTI DEVANANDAM, S/O. ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. KALVATALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 17. NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. SURYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YRS, OCC. WORKING AS VRO, ANKIREDDYPELLY, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 18. CHENNAIAH, S/O. YESURATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 29 YRS, OCC. WORKING AS VRO, ITIKYALA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaringthe inaction of the Respondent No.3 and 4 in not providing the Police Protection to the Petitioner and save his life from the Respondent Nos.6 to 18, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also against the principal of the Natural Justice and consequently (i). To direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to provide Police Protection to the Petitioner and his Family Members, (ii). To Direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to complete the Investigation, which is pending before them on Complaint made by the Petitioner against the Unofficial Respondents 6 to 18.” 3 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of counter, would submit that, Petitioner ventured to encroach hill area to an extent of Ac.50.00 cents on the guise of plantation and the Revenue Officials and the political leaders objected the same and got the Petitioner vacated the site. In that view, the Petitioner filed the present petition seeking police protection. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that, if Police protection is given to the Petitioner, he will continue his illegal activities. 3. None appeared for the Petitioner. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.09.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24558 of 2020 Dt.10.09.2025 Dinesh