s IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADEiSH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdictiion) WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE " ’ PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17602 OF 2019 Between: 1. Rajala Konda Reddy, S/o. Ramaswamy Reddy, Aged about 47 Years, Occ. CMO, SSA, Ongole, R/o. H.No.8-99, Kothapeta, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 2. K. Hemalatha, D/o. Madhava Rao, Aged about 43 Years, Occ. Asst GCDO, SSA, Ongole, R/o. Santhapeta, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. Ch. Ananda Rao, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged about 55 Years, Occ. ALS, Coordinator. SSA, Ongole, R/o. Nirrnala Nagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4. R. Jagannadha Rao, S/o. Venkata Subba Rao Rao, Aged about 51 Years, Occ. Asst IE Coordinator, SSA, Ongole, R/o. Ramnagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. S. Sudha Madhuri, D/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 51 Years, Occ. IE Coordinator, SSA, Ongole, Rio. Bhagyanagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The State Project Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, (SSA), Andhra Pradesh, KBC Boys High School Premises, Patamata, Vijayawada. 3. The District Collector and Chairman Sarva Siksha Abhiyan Prakasam District, Ongole. 4. The District Educational Officer and Ex-Officio Project Coordinator, SSA, Prakasam District, Ongole. 5. The Project Officer, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, (SSA), 0pp. ABM College, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in issuing proceedings vide Re.No.562/A1/APSSA/2019-1, dated 29.10.2019 repatriating Petitioners (Sectorial and Assistant Sectorial Officers) working in AP Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, in Prakasam District, Ongole in unceremonious manner without following procedure and further directing the Petitioners to reporting before the 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and discrimination and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to guidelines issued by the 2nd Respondent and set aside the same and Consequently direct the Respondents to continue and extend the services of the Petitioners by conducting District Level Review Committee as per the proceedings issued by the 2nd Rc.No.2271/APSSA/AI2/2019, dated 08.07.2019. respondent in lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to grant extension to the Petitioners as Sectorial and Assistant Sectorial Officers by placing the cases of the Petitioners before the District Review Committee. lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the Petitioners as Sectorial and Assistant Sectorial Officers by suspending the proceedings issued by the 5th Respondent vide Rc.No.562/AI/APSSA/2019-1, dated 29.10.2019 lA NO: 3 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the 3rd petitioner to withdraw as petitioner and claim in the above writ petition and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. Y NAGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following Order: % APHC010368592019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17602/2019 Between: 1.RAJALA KONDA REDDY, S/0. RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. CMO, SSA, ONGOLE, R/0. H.NO.8-99, KOTHAPETA, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2.K. HEMALATHA, D/0. MADHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. ASST GCDO, SSA, ONGOLE, R/0. SANTHAPETA, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3.CH. ANANDA RAO, S/0. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. ALS, COORDINATOR. SSA, ONGOLE, R/0. NIRMALA NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4.R. JAGANNADHA RAO, S/0. VENKATA SUBBA RAO RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. ASST IE COORDINATOR, SSA, ONGOLE, R/O. RAMNAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5.S. SUDHA MADHURI, D/0. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. IE COORDINATOR, SSA, ONGOLE, RIO. BHAGYANAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT SECRETARY, BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, (SSA), ANDHRA PRADESH, KBC BOYS HIGH SCHOOL PREMISES, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER AND EXOFFICIO PROJECT COORDINATOR, SSA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 5.THE PROJECT OFFICER, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, (SSA), OPP. ABM COLLEGE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): • 2 y Nag I Counsel for 1GPFOR 2- G SEENA The Court QBQER: REDDY the Respondent(S): SCHOOL education Rumar "’ade the following: CAP) This Writ Petition « filed under the following Article 226 of Constitution prayer for: of India with 29 '10^20%^'^°^^^^'^ action of the a? Articles 14, 19 ann '’, ^^‘^'^rary and discrir^ ? ^^fore the issued by fhe^J'y of ^°^foguently direct %e f?f^^^°odent and set ^^^trary to When (he O8.07.201S' ’^^‘^Pondent m counsel for the this matter Learned submit that Court and 4th 2. d^atter is taken Rotitioners up for h^^ring, sn Y.t^egi Reddy , learned required in would submit that sought in this no further orders petition has become as the relief Assistant are 3. ir^fructuous. school Educati Government Pleader for 3 may pass ion would appropriate orders, submissions n 4. Considering the '■e/ief has become,- ^ade, the Wht Pet,t,'on / There shall be -ri IS dismissed as to costs. - infructuous. -^oel thereto, miscellaneous as the '^o order petitions, if As a c/osed. any, pending shall stand Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER e CC to Sri. Y Nagi Reddy, Advocate [OPUCi^J 2. Two CCS to GP for School Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies Education (AP) ,Hig h Court Of Andhra vna * ‘ HIGH COURT DATED:18/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.17602 of 2019 g 3 I M 2025 a Cay. Current Section .-W DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS