[2025:RJ-JP:34083] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11593/2025 Jamwai Innovations Private Limited, A Company Registered Under Companies Act, 2013, Having Its Registered Office Address A-7, Narayanpuri, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Its Director Sh. Shaazad S/o Abdul Waheed, Aged About 50 Years, 353 Mehnat Nagar, Hatawada, Hasanpura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (Rsrtc), Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Office Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Standing Committee, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (Rsrtc), Through Its Presiding Officer Chairman And Managing Director, Office Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Executive Director (Admn.), Rsrtc Chomu House, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. The Chief Manager, Rsrtc Cbs Depot, Sindhi Camp, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RB Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG with Mr. Harshvardhan Katara Mr. Alok Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 27/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the present petition with the alternate clause that claim made before the Standing Committee, as referred to in Clause 55 of the terms and conditions of the contract (Annexure - 3) be considered. [2025:RJ-JP:34083] (2 of 3) [CW-11593/2025] 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed claim against order dated 16th June, 2025 (Annexure – 2). It is pleaded that directions may be given that the said claim be adjudicated within a period of fortnight following the principles of natural justice. 3. Learned Senior Counsel – Mr. Bharat Vyas, assisted by learned counsel – Mr. Harshvardhan Katara, appearing for the respondents, has not opposed the same. Howsoever, it is submitted that vide order dated 11th August, 2025, due amount of fee be deposited to the tune of Rs.1,03,164/- was directed to be deposited. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has opposed the same and submits that the said fee is not tenable for the following reasons: 4.1 That if contract of the petitioner is renewed, it will be for the period of one year whereas the contractual terms and conditions were for a period of five years; 4.2 The other litigant in the instant petition is RSRTC, thus they should also bear equal amount of fee i.e. half of the share and the same is required to be paid by them; 5. Considering the aforementioned arguments, this Court, while keeping the point viz.-a-viz. the merits and demerits of the case open, and considering the urgency of the matter, directs that the claim of the petitioner, before the Standing Committee, be adjudicated within a period of fortnight. 6. Accordingly, both the parties are directed to appear before the Standing Committee on 03rd September, 2025 at or around 11.00 AM and if the petitioner wants to file representation, [2025:RJ-JP:34083] (3 of 3) [CW-11593/2025] stating their grievance, he may do so. If the petitioner files any representation, on the aforesaid date, before Standing Committee, the same be adjudicated by the Standing Committee by 09th September, 2025. 7. The said fee to be deposited by the petitioner will be of sum of Rs.50,000/- and the same be deposited on 03rd September, 2025. 8. Till disposal of the matter, status quo, as is maintained today, be maintained. 9. With the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and/or any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Preeti Asopa /81