[2025:RJ-JP:29020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9650/2025 Keliram Meena @ Failiram S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena, R/o Mandoda Ki Dhani, Village Dyodhachod, Tehsil Bassi, Police Station Kanota, Districtjaipur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Mritunjaya Sharma for Ms. Seema Kala HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.528/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that nothing has been alleged against the petitioner by any of the witnesses. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:29020] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9650/2025] 4. Counsel for the complainant/injured does not oppose the prayer of bail made by learned counsel for the petitioner and has no objection if this bail application is accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the material available before me in the form of case diary, as also considering the fact that nothing has been alleged against the petitioner by any of the witnesses and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Keliram Meena @ Failiram S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/387