TADIBOINA SRIGIRI KUMAR RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/974/2025 · 2025-01-20
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2610 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2610 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
V N 'V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRA WRIT PETITION NO: 974 OF 2025 Between: Tadiboina Srigiri Kumar Rao, S/o. late Tadiboina Mallikarjuna Rao, R/o. Plot No. 259, Road No. 12, Vaidehi Nagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad City, K.V. Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by it Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secreatariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Amaravathi. The District Collector, Guntur District. The RDO, Sub- Collector, Tenali, Guntur District. The Thahsildhar, Tenali, Guntur District. The VRO., Tenali Village, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. 3. 4. 5 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue writ. Order or direction more particularly one nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the pattadhar passbook and title deed in favour of the petitioner for his land in D.No.32/2 with may in the an extent of Ac.0.40 cents situated at Tenali
Village, Tenali Sub-Registration District, Guntur District, is highly illegal, arbitrary, colorable exercise of law, apart from violation of Art. 19(1)(g) 300-A of Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondent to issue pattadhar passbook and title deeds in favour of the petitioner forthwith for his land in D.No.32/2 with an extent of Ac.0.40 cents situated at Tenali Village, Tenali Sub-Registration District, Guntur District by considering the representations dated 09-1-2024 and 23-07-2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to Issue pattadhar passbook deed to the petitioner for his land in D.No.32/2 with an extent of Ac.0.40 cents situated at Tenali Village, Tenali Sub Registration District, Guntur District by considering the representations of the petitioner dated 09-1- 2024 and 23-07-2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. PALLA BALU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: and title
•?
APHC010005402025 [3328] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ MONDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 974/2025 Between: 1.TADIBOINA SRIGIRI KUMAR RAO, S/0. LATE TADIBOINA MALLIKARJUNA RAO, R/0. PLOT NO. 259, ROAD NO. 12, VAIDEHI NAGAR, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD CITY, K.V. RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IT PRINCIPAL REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECREATARIAT, SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE RDO, SUB- COLLECTOR, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.THE THAHSILDHAR, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.THE VRO, TENALI VILLAGE, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PALLA BALU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2 The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Palla Balu Anil Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner appearing through Online and Ms.B.Sravani, learned Assistant Government Pleader. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted Written
2. Instructions furnished by the Tahsildar, Tenali Mandal dated
18.01.2025. A copy of it is not supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner as he is appearing Online. The same is taken on record; The Written Instructions would disclose several reasons for not
3. entertaining the Representations of the Writ Petitioner dated 09.01.2024 & 23.07.2024 (Ex.P1). The record would indicate that within a period of about six months, the
4. Writ Petitioner has made two Representations to the concerned authorities. In response to the first Representation dated 09.01.2024, the Sub-Collector, Tenali has already addressed a letter to the Tahsildar on 24.01.2024 (Ex.P4). However the present Written Instructions is silent about the conduct of
5. the Tahsildar from 24.01.2024 i.e., the date on which the Sub-Collector has addressed a letter to the Tahsildar requiring the Tahsildar to act on the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner herein. Having regard to the above facts, this Court is rather constrained to
6. comment on the conduct of the Tahsildar about his inaction from January, 2024 to till date. This Court is also constrained to make an adverse observation that the present Written Instructions is completely silent about the
3 letter addressed by the Sub-Collector to the Tahsildar on 24.01.2024.
If this is the way in which the Tahsildar would conduct himself, this Court would not hesitate to initiate departmental action against the Tahsildar for dereliction of duty. Be that as it may, under the present circumstances this Court deems it
7. appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition, at the admission stage, without going into the merits, directing the Tahsildar to consider the Representations submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 09.01.2024 & 23.07.2024 and pass a Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today and communicate a copy of such Order to the Writ Petitioner forthwith. Needless to state that the Tahsildar is obligated to issue advance
8. Notice to all the interested parties including the Writ Petitioner herein, consider their submissions/objections and documents, if any, before passing the final
Order. Writ Petitioner directed to submit a copy of this Order to the Tahsildar (Respondent No.4) along with photocopies of the Representations dated 09.01.2024 & 23.07.2024 within one week from today for effective compliance. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands
9.
disposed of. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
10.
Sd/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRY //TRUE COPY// SE OFFICER To
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Amaravathi.
%
2. The District Collector, Guntur District.
3. The RDO, Sub- Collector, Tenali, Guntur District.
4. The Thahsildhar, Tenali, Guntur District.
5. The VRO., Tenali Village, Tenali, Guntur District.
6. One CC to Sri. Palla Balu Anil Kumar Advocate [OPUO
7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
8. Three CD Copies GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:20/01/2025
ORDER WP.No.974 of 2025 I DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS