Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26090 (MAD)

M/s HDB Financial Services Limited v. S Arul

Arb Appln/341/2025 · 2025-03-26

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb.Appln.No.341 of 2025 M/s.HDB Financial Services Limited ... Applicant Vs. S. Arul and Another ... Respondents ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., Notices sent to the respondents have been duly served. An affidavit of service, enclosing the delivery report has also been filed, which confirms that the respondents have received notices in this application. Despite service of notices, the respondents have chosen not to enter appearance. Hence, the respondents are set ex-parte by this Court. 2. The advocate commissioner appointed by this Court has also repossessed the vehicle as directed by this Court. The advocate commissioner seeks for payment of additional remuneration. Initially the advocate commissioner was paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/-. The vehicle was repossessed from Kanyakumari District. The applicant is directed to pay the advocate commissioner an additional remuneration of Rs.20,000/- within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis of this order. 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., ab 3. Since the vehicle has been repossessed and the respondents have been set ex-parte by this Court, nothing survives for further adjudication in this application. Accordingly, this application is closed. 26.03.2025 ab Arb.Appln.No.341 of 2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis