DHRUBA JYOTI KALITA ALIAS D KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/1458/2025 · 2026-01-27
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2609 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2609 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010139832025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1458/2025 DHRUBA JYOTI KALITA ALIAS D KALITA SON OF LATE KAMAL CHANDRA KALITA, R/O JURIPAR, KHANAPARA, P.O. KHANAPARA, P.S. DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BORA, MR. V A CHOWDHURY,MS. C CHOUDHURY,MR. D GAGAI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
ORDER Date : 28 .01. 2026 Heard Mr. A.M. Bora, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. C. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondent. This application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 filed by the petitioner, namely Dr. Dhruba Jyoti Kalita @ D. Kalita, apprehending arrest in connection with Kharupeieta P.S. Case No. 59/2025 registered under Sections 120(B)/ 466/ 468 of IPC, 1980.
Page No.# 2/2 The allegation appears to be that the petitioner procured a fake birth certificate in respect of the victim. The case diary as called for is received and perused. As per report of the learned SDMO and H.Q., Kharupetia PHC and Addl. Registrar of Birth and Death, BPHC, the date of birth of the alleged victim Rimika Tanti has been ascertained as 25.07.1997 which would show that the petitioner was prima facie not involved in submission of fake birth certificate in order to show the victim as a major before the Court below. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. In view of the above, interim order dated 25.06.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions that:- (1) the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation; (2) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case; and (3) the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any other police officer. The bail application is allowed and disposed of. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant