IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8722 of 2024 Rahul Kumar Paswan @ Rahul Paswan, Aged about 26 years, S/O-Nand Kishore Paswan, R/O- Lakshmi Colony, Near Shiv Mandir, P.O + P.S- Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party WITH B.A. No. 9000 of 2024 Gautam Kumar Paswan, Aged about 28 years, S/O-Nand Kishore Paswan, R/O- Lakshmi Colony, Near Shiv Mandir, P.O. + P.S- Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : M/s. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : M/s. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P : M/s. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P --- 06/04.02.2025 Heard the Parties. Both these bail applications arise out of same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. Petitioners have been made an accused in connection with S.T Case No. 09/2024, arising out of Jorapokhar P.S Case No. 175/2023, Corresponding to G.R Case No. 2637/2023 for the offence under sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Dhanbad.. On 14.08.2023 at about 02:45 A.M., son of the informant, namely, Amit Singh was shot dead by named accused persons and one unknown person. Learned A.P.P. and learned Special P.P. have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that on the basis of confession of both these petitioners, the firearm used in commission of murder of the deceased was recovered. They also submitted that same firearms were sent for forensic examination and from the perusal of the forensic report, it appears that this firearm was used in the commission of the murder of the deceased. Learned lawyer appearing for the petitioners submitted that for the recovery of the said firearm, another Police case was instituted. It was further submitted that the present case has not been registered under any section of the Arms Act. It was further submitted that charge has not been framed under any section of the Arms Act. Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of the case; I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is hereby rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh uploaded