- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15232 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY S/O. LATE. VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 2. SMT NAREMMA W/O LATE SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI TAYGARAJ S/O. LATE. SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SRI VENKATESH S/O. LATE. SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT PERAMACHANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK. CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563128. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. LAKSHMINARAYANA S/O LATE.NANEPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 2. SRI DEVARAJU S/O LATE NANEPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 3. SRI AMBARISHA S/O LATE NANEPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 4. SRI SREENATHA S/O LATE NANEPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R1 TO R4 ARE R/AT PERAMACHANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563128. 5. SMT. SHAMALAMMA W/O LATE SRINIVASA R D/O LATE NANEPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO-295, WARD NO-12 NAYAKARABEEDHI, KOTE CHIKKABALLAPURA 562101. 6. SMT. YASHODAMMA W/O LATE RAMANJANEYAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 7. SRI GAJENDRA S/O LATE RAMANJANEYAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 8. SRI GOWRI D/O LATE RAMANJANEYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 9. SMT SAKAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 10. SRI NAVEENA S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 11. SRI PRAVEENA S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R6 TO R11 ARE R/AT NEAR MARUTHI TEMPLE CHIKKAJALA VILLAGE AND POST BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562157. 12. SMT. NAREMMA W/O LATE RAMADASAPPA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT PERAMACHANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563128. 13. SMT. SHANTHAMMA D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA W/O RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT KOTAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, SIDLAGAHTTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 562138. 14. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA W/O NARAYANASWAMY (BAJANTRI) AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT VEMAGAL VILLAGE BASHATTIHALLI HOBLI SHILAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563102. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 15. SMT. VENKATARATHNA D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA W/O MUNIRATHNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 26/4, SURBI COLONY ANKASHITTYPALLI POST MADANAPALLI TALUK ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT ANDRAPRADESH 517325. 16. SMT. MEENAKSHI D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA W/O NAGARAJ (BANJANTHI) AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT YACHHANAHALLI VILLAGE RONUR HOBLI, SRINIVASAPUR TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT 571101. 17. SMT. ARUNA D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA W/O MURALI (BAJANTHI) AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT KEMBAGANAHALLI VILLAGE & POST NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562114. 18. SMT. MANJULA D/O LATE RAMADASAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT KONDAMARAPALLI VILLAGE CHAKAVAL POST, CHELUR HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-535221. 19. SRI. NATARAJ S/O LATE RAMADASAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 20. SRI. VENKATESH S/O. LATE. RAMADASAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R19 & R20 ARE R/AT PERAMACHANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563128. 21. SMT. AKKAYAMMA W/O LATE SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT PERAMACHANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563128. 22. SRI. SUBRAMANI S/O LATE SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT ADHIVISHVANATHAPURA VILLAGE HESARAGATTA HOBLI, ARIKERI POST BANGALORE NORTH 562163. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN FDP NO. 8/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHINTAMANI, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioners challenging the - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:7414 WP No. 15232 of 2024 initiation of the proceedings in FDP No.8/2023 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chintamani. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit for partition has been decreed on 11.07.2005. After lapse of 19 years, FDP has been filed and the same cannot be entertained. Hence, he sought for allowing the writ petition. 3. The petitioners have not brought to the notice of this Court as to whether there is any limitation for filing FDP. 4. If there is no limitation for filing FDP and if it is not barred by any law, FDP cannot be set aside. Hence, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24