PRAVEEN GARG S/O HARISH CHAND GARG v. INCOME TAX OFFICER
CW/12556/2024 · 2025-03-24
Avneesh Jhingan, Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26084 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26084 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13220-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12563/2024 Praveen Garg, S/o Shri Harish Chand Garg, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Plot No. 51, Basant Vihar, Alwar- 301001, Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Wards 1(1), Alwar, Income Tax Office, C R Building, Motidoongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan- 301001 ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12556/2024 Praveen Garg S/o Harish Chand Garg, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Plot No. 51, Basant Vihar, Alwar - 301001, Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer, Wards 1(1), Alwar, Income Tax Office, Cr Building, Moti Doongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan-301001 ----Respondent D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12566/2024 Praveen Garg S/o Shri Harish Chand Garg, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Plot No. 51, Basant Vihar, Alwar 301001, Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer Wards 1(1), Alwar, Income Tax Office, C R Building, Moti Doongri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan- 301001. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Gunjan Pathak with Mr.Kanishk Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Anuroop Singhi with Mr.N.S.Bhati & Mr.Aditya Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
[2025:RJ-JP:13220-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-12563/2024]
Order 24/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length is not pressing the petitions with liberty to approach the department for supply of reasons and the material relied upon in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Gkn Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer And Ors. reported in 259 ITR Page 19.
2. The petitions are disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner approaching the department for seeking information, the same would be considered in accordance with law expeditiously.
4. All pending application(s) stands disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/62-64