1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4523 of 2025 1 - Ram Saran Yadav S/o Nemichand Yadav Aged About 51 Years Working As Chowkidar Office Of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Mahasamund, Block- Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector And Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Development Branch) Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Harish Khutiya, Advocate. For State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 18.06. 202 5 1. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief (s): “1. That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to grant regular pay scale to the petitioners under the consistency services immediately on completion of 3 years services from the initial date of appointment and direction be given to the 2 respondent departments to give difference to pay to the petitioners and all the benefits on the basis of equal pay for equal work. 2. That, any other relief/order which may deem it and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed on the post of Chowkidar/Waterman/Cook under the respondent No.1 department on 31.08.1996 and 12.08.1994 as daily wager employee on Collectors’ rate and, therefore, he is entitled to get benefit of regular pay scale after completion of three years of service. However, he has been granted regular pay-scale from 09.09.2008. He further submits that similar relief has already been granted to certain persons whose services were also regularized in the State Government. He refers to an order dated 20.04.2018 and submits that in the like situation, few of other persons, who were similarly placed, have been given the benefit of regular pay scale on completion of three years of service. 3. At this juncture, learned State Counsel submits that it would be better if petitioners file a detailed fresh representation before Respondent No.4 along with all relevant documents in support of their claim including the orders of the State Government as also the orders of the High Court in other connected petitions. He further submits that in case representation is made, Respondent No.4 will decide the same at the earliest. 4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel has not opposed the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Considering facts of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, writ petition is disposed of at this stage giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.4 along with all relevant documents in this regard whereby similar benefits were given to other persons. On making such representation, respondent No.4 shall consider and 3 decide the same, in accordance with law within a period of ‘90 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of such representation. 6. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the entitlement of petitioner is concerned. The respondents-authorities shall be free to take a decision purely in accordance with the rules governing the field. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder