Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26081 (AP)

G M V CHALAPATHI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/17652/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010369542019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 17652/2019 Between: 1. G M V CHALAPATHI, S/O LATE (SRI) G.M. ANJANAPPA, AGE . 59 YEARS, OCC . TAHSILDAR, GUMMAGATTA MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, AT ANANTAPURAM 505 001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT. REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, , GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction and 2 more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No. 2 in issuing the Charge Memo. vide CCLA's Procg. No. VS. II (1)/889/2018 dated 31.10.2018 as arbitrary, illegal and in contravention of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land ,34 Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 read with Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land gt Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 and set aside the Charge Memo., issued by the 2nd Respondent vide CCLA's Procg. No. VS. II (1)/889/2018 dated 31.10.2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased the petitioner herein prays that this Hon'ble Court pending disposal of the writ petition, to direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Collector against the slot earmarked and without reference to Charge Memo. Issued vide Procg. No. VS. II (1)/889/2018 dated 31.10.2018, in the ensuing Departmental Promotion Committee to the post of Deputy Collector, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T VIJAY HANUMAN SINGH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 17652 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri T.Vijay Hanuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 17652 of 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 PSA