Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26081 (ALL)

VANDANA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/4732/2025 · 2025-03-11

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36339-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4732 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vandana Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. This writ petition is preferred praying for following principal relief: "A. Issue, a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the competent authority/respondents consider the application of petitioner and lodge the F.I.R. against the respondent no.3. " 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that petitioner's representation dated 20.02.2025 may be decided by respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Azamgarh within a time bound period. 5. Learned A.G.A. states that in case the said representation has not yet been decided, the same would be decided as per law. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to keep the writ petition pending consideration and call for a counter affidavit. 7. Therefore, without adverting on the merits of the case, with the consent of parties, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the second respondent i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Azamgarh to consider the representation of petitioner and pass appropriate order, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 12.3.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad