APHC010368692014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) QMS FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 20823 OF 2014 Between: K.Venkateswarlu, S/o. K.Krishnappa, Aged about: 50 Years, Door No. 12-3 Rajivgandhi Colony, Renigunta, Chittoor District ...Petitioner AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban District, Chittoor District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Alipiri Police Station, Tirupati Urban District Chittoor District. 4. B Gurnadha Reddy, S/o. B.Venkat Reddy, Aged about: Door No.6-32, 6th Line, B.T.R. Colony, Mangalam, Tirupati Rural, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3'^^ respondent in not registering the F.I.R. against the 4'*' respondent in spite of the endorsement dt.24.6.2014 to take appropriate action as per law by the 2"^^ respondent i.e. Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban District as illegal, arbitrary and .>e unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3^^ respondent to register a case against the 4*'' respondent and to take action as per law. lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 26114 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI I.M.S. PRAKASH FOR SRI D. PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010368692014 0M0 m IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 20823/201.4 ► Between: 1. K.VENKATESWARLU. DOOR NO.12-3, RAJIVGANDHI COLONY, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT S/0 K.KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT: 50 YRS ...PETITIONER AND REP. BY IT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, 1.THE PRINCIPAL HYDERABAD 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3.THE CIRCLE S/0 B.VENKAT REDDY AGED ABOUT: 4.B GURNADHA REDDY. door NO.6-32, 6TH LINE, B.T.R. COLONY, MANGALAM, TIRUPATI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT{S): Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Petition under . ^ u circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the F.l.R. against the 4th respondent in spite of the endorsement dt.24.6.2014 to take appropriate action as per law by the 2nd respondent i.e. Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register against the 4th respondent and to take action as per law, and lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 26114 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: a case m pass THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.20823 OF 2014 'f ORDER;- Sri l.M.S. Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri D.Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Placing the submission of the learned counsel on record, this Writ 2. Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIV.AS ASSISTANT f^iSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D. Purnachandra Reddy, Advocate 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CD Copies [OPUC] Pradesh [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED: 12/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 20823 OF 2014 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS