Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26076 (JHR)

RAJU RANA ALIAS RAJU KUMAR RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5574/2025 · 2025-09-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:28939 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5574 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5574 of 2025 ---- Raju Rana @ Raju Kumar Rana, aged about 31 years, son of Pankaj Rana, resident of near Old Civil Court, Dharambahal, Fuldungri, PO and PS – Ghatshila, District – East Singhbhum .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate :- Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Praful Jojo, Advocate ---- 02/19.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghatshila P.S. Case No.47 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatshila. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of Champa Karmakar and the allegations are made that Champa Karmakar has gone to Civil Court along with her aunt namely Sunita Karmakar and altercation took place between the petitioner and Champa Karmakar and in course of hot-talk when Sunita Karmakar tried to intervene she got injured from the motorcycle key of the petitioner and she got minor injury. He submits 2025:JHHC:28939 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5574 of 2025 that, however, allegations are made by way of knife the assault has been made. He submits that against the parents also the same allegation has been made, however, the parents have been granted anticipatory bail by learned Sessions Judge. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of assault. 5. Considering that the altercation took place between the husband and wife and it has been pointed out that the injury is simple in nature, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatshila in connection with Ghatshila P.S. Case No.47 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 19.09.2025 Sangam/