MEHTABKHAN AKBARKHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH S.L.A.O. SILLOD AURANGABAD AND ANR
CA/9311/2024 · 2025-08-12
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26073 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26073 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 958,960.CA-9312-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9312 OF 2024 IN FAST/22764/2024 DATTU SHAMRAO MORE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH S.L.A.O. SILLOD AURANGABAD AND ANR ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9311 OF 2024 IN FAST/22766/2024 … Advocate for the Applicant: Mr.Adkine Sonaji Kundlikrao AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.B.A.Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.2 :Mr.S.S.Dande ...
960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10828 OF 2024 IN FAST/24054/2024 TUKARAM S/O TRIMBAK GAIKWAD (DIED) THR. LRS. BHAGABAI T. GAIKWAD (DIED) THR LRS. NARAYAN AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, SILLOD, DIST. AURANGABAD AND ORS ... Advocate for the Applicant: Mr.Adkine Sonaji Kundlikrao AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.B.A.Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.2 :Mr. Bhushan V. Virdhe …
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 12.08.2025
2 958,960.CA-9312-2024.odt
PER COURT : .
Learned counsel for the applicants informs that in identical set of circumstances and the length of delay, it was condoned and the appeal is admitted.
2. Stand over to 26.08.2025.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..