Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2607 (RAJ)

SHIVRAJ SHARMA S/O SHRI AMAN SHARMA v. CONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES

CW/605/2025 · 2025-03-19

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12388] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 605/2025 Shivraj Sharma S/o Shri Aman Sharma, Aged About 18 Years, R/o 204 Akshat Trilokya, H-50, Jharokeshwar Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur-302016 (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Consortium Of National Law Universities, Through President, Vice-Chancellor, Hidayatullah National Law University (Hnlu), Raipur. 2. Consortium Of National Law Universities, Through Vice- President, Director, Gujarat National Law University (Gnlu), Gandhinagar. 3. Consortium Of National Law Universities, Through Secretary, Vice Chancellor, Nlsiu, Bengaluru (Karanataka). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 19/03/2025 1. In the instant civil writ petition, issue pertains to challenge to the question paper and answer key of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) Examination-2025 and an application (IA No.1/2025) has been filed to transfer the instant writ petition to the High Court of Delhi for consideration on merits in the light of order dated 06.02.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Transfer Petition (Civil) No.46-54 of 2025 titled as 'Consortium of National Law Universities Vs. Master Aditya Singh (Minor) Etc.'. [2025:RJ-JP:12388] (2 of 2) [CW-605/2025] 2. Counsel appearing for respondents has no objection to transfer the instant writ petition in the light of order dated 06.02.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. Accordingly, the application (IA No.1/2025) is allowed. Registry is directed to transmit the record of present writ petition along with copy of this order to the High Court of Delhi forthwith, to be tagged and heard along with other writ petition(s) involving identical issue. 4. In addition to above, Office may keep the photostat copy of record of the writ petition along with copy of this order and for statistical purpose, instant writ petition stands disposed of. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/41