IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6481 of 2024 ------ Lalku Turi, aged about 30 years, son of Ugan Turi, resident of Village-Barwadih, P.O.-Dhangada, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist.-Chatra … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 28.03.2025 I.A. No. 3825 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this anticipatory bail application. Since, this anticipatory bail application is taken up today hence, the prayer has become infructuous. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) A.B.A. No. 6481 of 2024 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No.201 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/115/109/329(4)/352/351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder husband of the informant namely Kailash Kumar. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there was free fight between the parties and the informant party was the aggressor party. It is next submitted that from the side of the petitioner, the petitioner has first instituted Tandwa P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024 and as a counter blast, this false case has been foisted. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 20,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Chatra, in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No.201 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-