Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 15651 of 2024 Decided on: 09.01.2025 Parveen Devi … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another
… Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Law Officer, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure P-6) with the respondent–Department and this petition be disposed of by directing the Competent Authority to take appropriate decision thereupon within some time bond period.
3. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority in light of the averments made therein within a period of six weeks from today.
4. As prayed for by learned Law Officer, the issue of delay and latches shall be gone into by the Authority while deciding the representation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge January 09, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?