APHC010369032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18999/2025 Between: 1. BATHINI SIVA PARVATHI, W/O. B VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, AGED 63 YEARS R/O. 5/1/8/4/1A, RAJAPANAGAL ROAD, REVENUE WARD NO. 7, ONGOIE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, MA AND UD DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI.AMARAVATHI 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOIE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. BATTINA ARAVIND, S./O. B SIVA PRASAD, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. RAJAPANAGAL ROAD, REVENUE WARD NO. 7, ONGOIE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 . RAJA MANURI VENKATA SUMANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of the notice dated 11.03.2025, whereby the 2nd respondent proposed to cancel the tax assessment of the petitioner’s property. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner, through counsel, submitted a reply to the said notice on 18.03.2025. However, it is submitted that the 2nd respondent has erroneously informed that the tax assessment shall be cancelled on the ground that the documents submitted along with the application for tax assessment were allegedly not genuine. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent. 4. Perused the record. 5. The legal notice addressed by the petitioner in response to the impugned proceedings is admittedly issued by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a proper representation along with all the required documents to substantiate the petitioner’s stand and reply to the impugned proceedings, and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 28.07.2025 PNS 5