Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Brijmohan Jain vs. Akshay Kumar and others CMP(M) No. 38 of 2025 22.05.2025 Present: Mr.Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr.D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to
6. Mr.Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Ms.Rajvinder Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.7.
CMP(M) No.38 of 2025 Till date, no reply has been filed by the respondents. However, prayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is opposed by learned counsel for the respondents with submissions that day-to-day delay as required to be explained, has not been explained. After going through the averments made in the application and considering submissions of learned counsel for the parties, delay of 8 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of.
FAO No.
of 2025(FAO/48253/2024)
Appeal be registered. Copy of appeal be supplied to the opposite parties. Records be requisitioned. List for further orders on 22.07.2025 alongwith FAO Nos.118/2020, 135/2020, 118/2023, 215/2023, 121/2024, 141/2024, 170/2024, 216/2024, 239/2014 and 240/2024.
CMP No.
of 2025(CMPST/58343/24)
Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith up-to-date interest, in the Registry of this Court, on or before 15.07.2025, execution and operation of the impugned award dated 09.08.2024, passed by Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P., in Case RBT No.46-R/2 of 2023/17, titled as Akshay Kumar and others vs. Brijmohan Jain and another, shall remain stayed during pendency of the appeal. Alteration/modification/vacation on motion. Application stands disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
May 22, 2025 (Purohit)