Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26063 (PNJ)

MELA SINGH v. GURKIRAT KIRPAL SINGH AND OTHERS

COCP/615/2024 · 2025-09-04

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-615 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 Mela Singh Gurkirat Kirpal Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. non-compliance a co-ordinate Singh vs. State of Punjab and others directed to conclude the enquiry proceedings against the a period of 04 months from the date of order. 2. submits that the order dated complied with as, the two enquiries pending against the petition been concluded vide enquiry reports dated 16.05.202 Learned counsel for the respondents thus submits that nothing survives in the present petition. 3. handed over in Cour 615-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 04.09.2025 Mela Singh Versus Gurkirat Kirpal Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. JS Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the present petition alleging willful compliance of the order dated 31.07.2023 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP State of Punjab and others’, whereby the respondents have been directed to conclude the enquiry proceedings against the a period of 04 months from the date of order. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order dated 31.07.2023 (Annexure P complied with as, the two enquiries pending against the petition been concluded vide enquiry reports dated 16.05.202 Learned counsel for the respondents thus submits that nothing survives in the present petition. Copies of enquiry reports dated handed over in Court by learned counsel for the respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-615-2024 Date of Decision: 04.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. JS Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The petitioner has filed the present petition alleging willful of the order dated 31.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by CWP-16300-2023 titled as ‘Mela whereby the respondents have been directed to conclude the enquiry proceedings against the petitioner within a period of 04 months from the date of order. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents 31.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied with as, the two enquiries pending against the petitioner have been concluded vide enquiry reports dated 16.05.2024 and 30.05.2025. Learned counsel for the respondents thus submits that nothing survives in Copies of enquiry reports dated 16.05.2024 and 30.05.2025, t by learned counsel for the respondents is taken on The petitioner has filed the present petition alleging willful passed by Mela whereby the respondents have been petitioner within At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents stands duly er have and 30.05.2025. Learned counsel for the respondents thus submits that nothing survives in , is taken on RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.04 20:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-615 record. Cop petitioner. 4. passed in the present petition, the same stands 5. duly complied with by the respondents, as such, the cost imposed upon the respondents order dated 6. 7. 04.09.2025 rishu 615-2024 -2- record. Copies thereof, has also been supplied to learned counsel for the In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands Since, the order dated 31.07.2023 (Annexure P duly complied with by the respondents, as such, the cost imposed upon the respondents by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court order dated 07.05.2024, stands dispensed with. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 04.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable thereof, has also been supplied to learned counsel for the no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands disposed of, accordingly. 31.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied with by the respondents, as such, the costs of ₹10,000/- ordinate Bench of this Court vide dispensed with. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No thereof, has also been supplied to learned counsel for the no further orders are required to be 1) stands vide RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.04 20:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.