Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26062 (HP)

Brijmohan Jain v. Akshay Kumar and others

CMP.M/37/2025 · 2025-05-28

Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Brijmohan Jai Vs. Akshay Kumar and others. CMP (M) No. 37 of 2025 28.5.2025 Present: Mr.Hemant Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr.D.S. Nainta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 6. Mr.Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Ms.Rajvinder Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No. 7. CMP (M) No. 37 of 2025 Till date, no reply has been filed by the respondents. However, prayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is opposed by learned counsel for the respondents with submissions that day-to-day delay as required to be explained, has not been explained. After going through the averments made in the application and considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, delay of 8 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. ….. of 2025 (FAOST No. 48274 of 2024) Appeal be registered. Copy of appeal be supplied to the opposite parties. Records be requisitioned. List for further orders on 22nd July, 2025 alongwith FAO Nos. 118 of 2020, 135 of 2020, 118 of 2023, 215 of 2023, 121 of 2024, 141 of 2024, 170 of 2024, 216 of 2024, 239 of 2024 and 240 of 2024. CMP No. …. of 2025 (CMPST No. 58344 of 2024 Subject to deposit of entire awarded amount alongwith up to date interest, in the Registry of this Court, on or before 15.7.2025, execution and operation of impugned award dated 9.8.2024, passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. in Case RBT No. 49-R/2 of 2023/17, titled as Akshay Kumar & others Vs. Brijmohan Jain and Another, shall remain stayed during pendency of the appeal. Alteration/modification/vacation on motion. The application stands disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. 28th May, 2025 (Keshav)