1 2025:CGHC:44520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4111 of 2020 1 - Ganesh Kumar Banjara, S/o Shri Fattelal Banjara, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Bagra, Post Basti - Bagra, Tehsil Pendra Road, District Gaurela - Pendra - Marwahi, Chhattisgarh., District : Gaurela- Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director, Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mission Director, National Health Mission, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector, Tehsil Pendra Road, District Gaurela - Pendra - Marwahi, Chhattisgarh., District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Gaurela - Pendra - Marwahi, Chhattisgarh., District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.09.03 12:44:32 +0530 2 7 - Praveen Kumar, S/o Shri Ram Purena, Aged About 27 Years Serving As Microbiologist, Through Chief Medical And Health Officer, Gaurela - Pendra - Marwahi, Chhattisgarh., District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Shriya Jaiswal, Advocate appears on behalf of Ms. Anubhuti Marhas, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 02/09/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by the efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. In view of above submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi