APHC010368992024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 18923/2024 Between: 1. D SHANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE BALA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. I.DANAPRASAD REDDY, S/O LATE MALLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. I.RAMIREDDY, S/O MALLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. C.SRINIVASULU, S/O CHINNA SUBBA RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. I.SIVA PRASADA REDDY, S/O MALLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. J.RAMA GANGIREDDY, S/O VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. MULLA BASHEER AHMED, S/O MOULALI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. C.SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O CHINNA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 9. B.V. RAMANA REDDY, S/O CHINNA PAPIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. AGRICULTURE, R/O TANGUTUR VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LANDS.VII) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, A P C.F.M.S., 6TH FLOOR, C- BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHONE, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBTREASURY OFFICER, DHONE, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. THE SECRETARY FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, A.P. R6 IS SUOMOTO IMPLEADED AS PER THE CO DT.19.09.2024 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V MALLIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Sri Sastry, Ld. Counsel (appearing through online) on behalf of Sri V. Mallik, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition, by arraying the correct parties. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition by arraying the correct parties. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.02.2025 Mnr 55 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.18923 OF 2024 Dt.03.02.2025 Mnr