Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2606 (RAJ)

RAMAWATAR S/O PRATHVIRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/201/2025 · 2025-01-16

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.119/2025 1. Mahesh S/o Goverdhan, 2. Dilkhush S/o Prahlad, 3. Ajay Kumar S/o Surajmal, All are R/o Mahariya, Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa. (At Present Accused Petitioners Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.201/2025 Ramawatar S/o Prathviraj, R/o Satala Ki Dhani, Village Bagadi, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Lalsot, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. G.S. Gauttam, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.225/2024, registered at Police Station Mandawari, District [2025:RJ-JP:2347] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-119/2025] Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 191(2), 190, 224, 121(1), 132, 262, 352 and 221 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is alleged against the accused-petitioners that they obstructed the Police Officials to execute their duty and aided the wanted criminal Suresh Kumar. It is also contended that the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioners are false, as the Police Officials did not receive any injuries. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may by allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, without further expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Mahesh S/o Goverdhan, 2. Dilkhush S/o Prahlad, 3. Ajay Kumar S/o Surajmal and 4. Ramawatar S/o Prathviraj, in connection with FIR No.225/2024, registered at Police Station Mandawari, District Dausa, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before [2025:RJ-JP:2347] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-119/2025] the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-306-307