VINAY KUMAR SAHU ALIAS BUNTY SAHU ALIAS BUNTI SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6616/2024 · 2025-06-17
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26050 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26050 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15778 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6616 of 2024 ------ Vinay Kumar Sahu @ Bunty Sahu @ Bunti Sahu, son of Ram Kumar Sahu, resident of village Charda, PO and PS Sisai, District Gumla … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. ----- 06/ 17.06.2025 Heard the parties.
2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under Sections 307/452/506 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga in connection with Bhandra PS Case No. 84 of 2022 corresponding to GR No. 95 of 2023.
3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
4. It has been submitted that processes under section 82 Cr.PC corresponding to section 84 of BNSS has already been issued against the petitioner.
5. Considering the fact that processes under section 84 of BNSS has already been issued against the petitioner, this Court finds it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed considering the aforesaid circumstance.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3