[2025:RJ-JP:7224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 273/2025 Piyush Pareek S/o Shri Rajbabu Pareek, Aged About 43 Years, R/o House No. 35, Green Vatika, Ram Mandir Ke Pas, Nangal Jaisa Bohara, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur West. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subodh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-AAG with Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Kamal Kumar Gupta, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.133/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 471, 120B & 468 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that entire offence is based on documents and same are in possession of investigation agency. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any [2025:RJ-JP:7224] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-273/2025] fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. They submit that in a very planned manner, plot of complainant was malafidely purchased by the petitioner and thereafter, same was sold to another person. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Piyush Pareek S/o Shri Rajbabu Pareek, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall [2025:RJ-JP:7224] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-273/2025] mark his presence in first and third week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /110