Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26048 (RAJ)

MONU KUMAR S/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9470/2024 · 2025-02-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9470/2024 Monu Kumar S/o Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Azad Nagar, Delhi Road, Belaka Ke Paas, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Bairwa Ms. Sushmita Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Ashok Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.646/2023 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 458 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that there was petty dispute between the parties and same has been resolved amicably. It is submitted that petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of order dated 19.09.2024. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:6347] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9470/2024] 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. He submits that he has no objection if this bail application is accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioner and as also the fact that petitioner has joined the investigation in pursuance of order dated 09.09.2024, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar in FIR No.646/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner - Monu Kumar S/o Shri Kailash Chand, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J CHARU SONI /245