JITENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI POKHARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9643/2025 · 2025-08-18
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26046 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26046 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:32217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9643/2025 Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Pokharmal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sihot Badi, Tehsil Dhod, Police Station Dhod, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 18/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.233/2025 registered at Police Station Amer, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence punishable under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that false recovery of 16 gram 09 miligram MDMA has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Trial of the case will take time in its conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:32217] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9643/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application & submits that petitioner has been found in possession of MDMA which was in commercial quantity.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced at bar, as also the fact that matter pertains to recovery of contraband (MDMA) which was in commercial quantity; investigation is going on, thus, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for disposal of the instant bail application and would not prejudice trial in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /209