APHC010368572005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9016/2005 Between: 1. K.SURENDRA & 3 ORS, S/O.K.KANDASWAMY VODIYAR, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. N.MANAVALAIAH,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. N.KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. D.ESWARAIAH,, S/O.D.RAMAIAH, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUM DISTRICT. 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, rep.by its Executive officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not creating / upgradation of the post of flower tiers is IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9016/2005 K.SURENDRA & 3 ORS, S/O.K.KANDASWAMY VODIYAR, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. N.MANAVALAIAH,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. N.KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. D.ESWARAIAH,, S/O.D.RAMAIAH, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, rep.by its Executive officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not creating / upgradation of the post of flower tiers is illegal, arbitrary and further direct the respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI K.SURENDRA & 3 ORS, S/O.K.KANDASWAMY VODIYAR, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA N.MANAVALAIAH,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIRUPATHI. N.KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O.L.S.NARAYANA, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN THE O/O. TTD DEVASTHANAM, TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI. D.ESWARAIAH,, S/O.D.RAMAIAH, WORKING AS FLOWER TIERS IN ALA TIRUPATHI. CHITTOOR ...PETITIONER(S) THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, rep.by its Executive ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not creating / upgradation illegal, arbitrary and further direct the respondent to create /upgrade the post of flower tiers as per the recommendation of the Garden Superintendent and fillup the posts by promoting the petitioners as flower tieres and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 11864 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pass appropriate orders on the recommendation made by the Garden Superintendent vide GS2/ 812/TML/2000, dt.25-08-2001 and GS2/812/TML/2000, dt.5-3-2002 pending final disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V R N PRASHANTH The Court made the following: ORDER Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition no longer survives and this writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition. In view of the submission so made this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR