Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26034 (AP)

S.Venkatarao Alias Sirasapalli Venkata Ramana v. Sirasapalli Ganga Chalam

SA/441/2003 · 2025-02-19

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010368672003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No: 441/2003 Between: S.venkatarao Alias Sirasapalli Venkata Ramana ...APPELLANT AND Sirasapalli Ganga Chalam and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V SUBRAHMANYAM THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2003, passed in A.S.No.40 of 1995 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 08.08.1995, passed in O.S.No.721 of 1985, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Vijayawada. 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides are present. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite their best efforts, they could not get instructions from their parties and reports no instructions. It seems that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 19.02.2025 M K K