IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CR No.1359 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Order:25.04.2025 Krishan Kumar .Appellant Versus Jai Shree ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: None ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. On 15.02.2025, the following order was passed:- “As per the office report, due to non filing of process fee, notice could not be issued to the respondent. The petitioner remains un-represented. Last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to file the process fee within one week from today, failing which the revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. The office is directed to inform the learned counsel representing the petitioner. If the process fee is filed, the office will issue notice to the respondent, for 19.03.2025.” 2. Thereafter, the case was taken up on 24.03.2025, and the following order was passed:- “As per the office report, notice issued to the sole respondent has not been received back served or otherwise. This revision petition is pending for the last 6 years. Hence, last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to serve the respondent by taking Dasti notice, for 25.04.2025. To be listed in the urgent list.” NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.28 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.1359 of 2019 (O&M) -2- 3. As per the office report, notice issued to the respondent has been received back with the report that his address could not be traced. 4. Though, the case was called thrice, however, the learned counsel representing the petitioner did not come forward to attend the hearing. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE April 25, 2025 nt Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.28 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document