Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26018 (KAR)

SRI M R RAJKUMAR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/15654/2025 · 2025-06-20

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21580 WP No. 15654 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15654 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI M R RAJKUMAR S/O REKHYANAYKA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT MADHAKARIPURA VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH.R.P.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501. 2. THE TAHSILDAR CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA - 577501. 3. ZILLA PANCHAYATH CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA - 577501 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21580 WP No. 15654 of 2025 DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 12/02/2013, IN WP NO.39251/2012 AS PER ANNEXURE E, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DECEASED MOTHER AND BY THE PETITIONER DATED 15/4/2013, 10/3/2025 AND ON 11/3/2025 UNDER ANNEXURE- F, J AND K RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for Respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition pertains to the implementation of the order of this Court dated 12.02.2013 in WP No. 39251/2012 (Annexure-E) and consideration of the representations produced at Annexures-F, J, and K, respectively. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21580 WP No. 15654 of 2025 4. It is further stated by the petitioner that Respondent No.1 has recommended for allotment of alternative land as per Annexure-H to the writ petition. 5. In that view of the matter, Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation produced at Annexure-K dated 12.03.2025 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30