Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26005 (PNJ)

RAM LAL AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/8859/2025 · 2025-05-26

Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-8859-2025 (O&M) -1- 136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8859-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2025 Ram Lal and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Arjun Kapur, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 & 5. ***** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, inter alia, praying for quashing of FIR No.0041 dated 05.04.2024, under Sections 420 & 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’), registered at Police Station Sadar Sangrur, District Sangrur along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 13.07.2025 (sic – 03.02.2025) [P-2] arrived at between the parties i.e. petitioners as well as respondent Nos.4 & 5. GAGANDEEP 2025.05.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-8859-2025 (O&M) -2- (2) Case called twice; but no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioners. (3) On the previous occasion also i.e. 22.04.2025, position was the same. (4) In view of the above, it appears that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the matter. (5) Consequently, there is no option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (6) Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 26th May, 2025 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) Gagan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No GAGANDEEP 2025.05.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh