Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2600 (RAJ)

MUNEEM BHADANA @ KAMAL S/O MUKHRAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/271/2025 · 2025-01-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1491] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 271/2025 Muneem Bhadana @ Kamal S/o Mukhram Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Akadawali, Tan Manwas (Talvriksh), Police Station Narayanpur, District Kotputli-Bahror (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Jail At District Jail, Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.245/2024, registered at Police Station Tahala, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2024, the recovery of bovine animals were effected from the other co-accused Roshan Lal. Later on, the accused-petitioner was taken on production warrant and no recovery of any bovine animals were effected from the possession of the present accused-petitioner and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:1491] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-271/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the factual report. 5. As per the factual report, the recovery of bovine animals were effected from the co-accused Roshan Lal, it is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Muneem Bhadana @ Kamal S/o Mukhram Gurjar, in connection with FIR No.245/2024, registered at Police Station Tahala, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-54