Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26 (UTT)

BABITA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/276/2025 · 2026-01-23

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA2 No. 276 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The applicant – Smt. Babita, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 752 of 2024, under Sections 309(6), 333, 3(5), 109 of BNS, registered at P.S.- Laksar, District Haridwar, has sought her release on bail. 4. This is the second bail application. The first bail application was dismissed on 29.07.2025. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of parity and in case, the applicant is granted bail, she will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 7. Learned State Counsel admits the fact that all the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 8. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that all the co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 9. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned. (Alok Mahra J.) Vacation Judge 23.01.2026 Ujjwal