- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11343 RSA No. 1442 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1442 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SUSHEELAMMA W/O LATE G. VEERANNA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/O YATHRI NIVAS NEAR MEJESTIC CIRCLE CHITRADURGA – 577 501. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SATHYAPREMA W/O LATE G. SANNAVERANNA 72 YEARS R/O 1ST CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION CHITRADURGA CITY – 577501. 2. KAMALAMMA W/O C. AKKI REDDY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O 2ND CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION CHITRADURGA CITY – 577 501. 3. DR. P.V. BASAVARAJ S/O G. VEERANNA AGE 65 YEARS R/O NO 58, 1ST MAIN 15TH CROSS, R.T. NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 032. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11343 RSA No. 1442 of 2018 4. AKRAM BASHA S/O LATE ABDUL RAOUF AGE 41 YEARS R/O DOOR No. 30/35 NALLAGUDDA STREET BANGALORE ROAD BELLARY – 583 101. 5. N. HARINATH BABU S/O LATE KRISHNA RAO AGE 53 YEARS 6. G. RAMAKRISHNA S/O G. SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 7. B. SRINIVASA S/O SURYA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 8. N. PULLAIAH CHOUDARI S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS No. 5 TO 8 ARE R/O KRISHNA NAGAR CAMP YERANGALI POST BELLARY DISTRICT – 583 101. 9. T.V. VENKATA SWAMY S/O T. SANJAPPA AGE 52 YEARS R/O VIDHYA NAGARA, 8TH CROSS BELLARY TOWN – 583 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. RAMA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R9; R3 IS SERVED; R4 SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED 20.06.2024) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11343 RSA No. 1442 of 2018 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.03.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.40/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.13/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite several requests made by him the appellant has not turned up to his office for giving instructions. As there is a peremptory order, the appellant has not taken steps, accordingly, appeal is dismissed for not taking steps. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:11343 RSA No. 1442 of 2018 In view of the dismissal of the appeal, I.A.Nos. 1/2018 and 2/2018 do not survive for consideration. Accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38