APHC010367592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18555/2025 Between: Gadamsetty Balakrishna Murthy, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18555/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Official Respondents more particularly the Official Respondents No.4 and 5 in regularly calling the Petitioner to come to City Task Force Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District without any justifiable cause and threatening with dire consequences to file false cases against him on the insistence of Unofficial Respondent No.6 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the Official Respondents No.4 and 5 not to call the Petitioner to the City Task Force Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District by interfering in civil matter and not to put troubles to the Petitioner and not to file any false cases against the Petitioners and his family members at the behest of Unofficial Respondent No.6 and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the petitioner was called to the Police Station to serve the notice relating to the Cr.No.248 of 2025 registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) BNS & Section 5 of APPD FE Act, 1999 before the Machavaram Police Station, NTR Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada and further submits that by suppressing the aforesaid fact, the petitioner filed the present petition. 3. Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow the due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.07.2025 SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18555 of 2025 Dated.22.07.2025 SRT 85