Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25994 (KAR)

KANVA EDUCATIONAL TRUST v. THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/13665/2025 · 2025-05-06

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18170 WP No. 13665 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 13665 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: KANVA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAJATH P. GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.302, 6TH MAIN ROAD, OPP. MLO CLUB, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 086 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHREERAM TIMMAPPA NAYAK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR SRI. KANVA SOUHARDHA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED AND KANVA GROUP OF COMPANIES BENGALURU AND REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DIVISION, BMTC BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. DEVARAJ C.H., GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. VEERESH R. BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18170 WP No. 13665 of 2025 THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 25.04.2025 BEARING LETTER PRA.A.KA/KPID/KANVA/CA/CR/46/2022-2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. TO THE PETITIONER VACATE THE PREMISE IN SY NO.5/4 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 26 GUNTAS OUT OF 2 ACRES 37 GUNTAS WHICH IS SUBJECT TO ATTACHMENT IN MISC NO. 1204/2023 BY THE SPECIAL COURT AT BENGALURU AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS W.P, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after addressing the arguments for sometime, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed with liberty to prefer an appeal as per Section 16 of KPID Act. Memo is placed on record. Hence, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to prefer an appeal as per Section 16 of KPID Act. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 95