SMT. NALINI RAO v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
CRL.RP/978/2022 · 2025-06-18
Shivashankar Amarannavar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25992 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25992 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20872 CRL.RP No. 978 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 978 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SMT. NALINI RAO W/O NAGARAJ H.J AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS THE THEN SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (M/S OICL) DO-2, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 009 RESIDING AT NO.101 EAST END, “C” MAIN ROAD 9TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR BENGALURU SOUTH-560 069 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIDYASAGAR R, ADVOCATE) AND:
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ANTI-CORRUPTION BRANCH NO.36, BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032 REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL AT HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO EXAMINE THE PROPRIETY, LEGALITY OF
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20872 CRL.RP No. 978 of 2022
IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 18.04.20222 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.425/2019 BY THE LEARNED XLVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-47) AND SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 18.04.2022 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.425/2019 BY THE LEARNED XLVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-47), BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of petition. The memo reads thus: The advocate for petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous in view of acquittal by the trial Court. Hence the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31